Not An Accident

Structure of DNA double helix

Structure of DNA double helix

Some atheists tell us that life is an accident and any circumstantial evidence humans come up with to the contrary is simply a trick of the mind that wishes to find patterns where none actually exist.

But I have to wonder—how do they know that no pattern exists? It seems to me, the belief that no pattern exists is a result of believing that there is no designer to formulate a pattern. Otherwise, when element after element after element aligns in a pattern, why would you think, Yeah, but that’s just a coincidence.

For instance, “DNA is a three-billion-lettered program telling the cell to act in a certain way. It is a full instruction manual.” (See “Is There a God?”) What are the chances of such an intricate “instruction manual” just happening to develop—for each cell of the human body?!

But DNA is a quite new discovery. Long before technology allowed us such a close look, we saw designs. Humans have a small set of eye colors and hair color and skin colors, but we have an infinite number of finger prints. Can that uniqueness happen by accident?

We could look at seasons and the hours of sunlight in the day and the rings inside a tree and weather patterns and the digestive system and breathing—we’d see evidence of design at every turn. All these particulars have such a long shot probability of happening accidentally, we might as well say it’s impossible.

Why is it a plane can fly? Because air pressure is a constant.

Why is it that meteors don’t fall to earth and crush us? Because our atmosphere is the right thickness to protect us.

How can we measure time? Because the earth rotates at a constant speed and travels around the sun at a rate that doesn’t fluctuate.

In fact, we have a set of “natural laws” that allow us to predict and study the way our universe works, including our bodies. We know that gravity pulls things toward the earth’s core. That’s an immutable law. Drop a pencil ten times, a thousand times, a billion billion times, and it will fall to the ground.

We have laws of physics, laws of biology, laws of chemistry, laws of botany, laws of geology, laws of meteorology. And then there is math. Two plus two is always four, not sometimes four and sometimes six.

Richard Feynman, a Nobel Prize winner for quantum electrodynamics, said, “Why nature is mathematical is a mystery…The fact that there are rules at all is a kind of miracle.”
(Ibid)

There is order to the world that points to anything but an accident.

Accidents don’t produce advanced technology. As many times as those automobile safety tests have a car hit a brick wall, not once has the car come out in an advanced state.

This just scratches the surface. I haven’t mentioned moral law or aesthetics. Each would need a post of its own.

The fact is, order exists in our world. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves.

And order does not come from disorder—that’s actually one of those laws of science.

So something ordered—not randomness, chaos, chance, or an accident—brought an ordered world into being. It’s only logical—which is also based on immutable laws. That someone looks at order and says, Caused by chance, reveals more about that someone than it does about the world.

What kind of person would look for an answer to the question, How did an ordered world full of intricate life—balanced ecosystems and complex organisms and natural laws—and conclude that the aggregation of it all came about by happenstance? Is that a logical conclusion? Or is that a conclusion someone would reach who has already ruled out the possibility of Someone great enough to design it all perfectly?

Take a look at just one fact about our planet, its distance from the sun:

The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Consider the temperature swings we encounter, roughly -30 degrees to +120 degrees. If the Earth were any further away from the sun, we would all freeze. Any closer and we would burn up. Even a fractional variance in the Earth’s position to the sun would make life on Earth impossible. The Earth remains this perfect distance from the sun while it rotates around the sun at a speed of nearly 67,000 mph. It is also rotating on its axis, allowing the entire surface of the Earth to be properly warmed and cooled every day. (Ibid)

What are the chances?

Well, some will tell us, given the vast number of galaxies in the universe, there’s a pretty good chance that there’s another planet just like ours with all the properties necessary for life.

And if there is such a place, why would we think it accidentally came into being any more than the Earth? If it’s unlikely that an accident produced one orderly biosphere, how much more unlikely would it be if there are two? In other words, a second habitable planet would increase the likelihood of design, not decrease it—given the incredibly improbable odds of all the right components being present to allow for life with respiratory systems and circulatory systems and digestive systems and cognition.

In all seriousness, I believe it takes wishful thinking to conclude that our planet, the solar system, the universe came about as a result of an accident instead of as the creation of an all powerful designer.

Advertisements
Published in: on July 31, 2015 at 7:17 pm  Comments (10)  
Tags: , , , ,

10 Comments

  1. Bravo! Excellent post! I must confess I did a similar post quite awhile ago, but yours if FAR superior. Well said, Rebecca! Very well said! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you, Tabitha. You’re very encouraging. I appreciate your feedback!

      Becky

      Like

  2. It takes more than “wishful thinking” to be blind to our Creator… it takes absurd denial. No matter how in depth your study of His creation may lead, God has made His presence crystal clear. Sadly, men are not really rejecting the evidence of a creator, they are rejecting the existence of their Creator.

    Wonderful post!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well said, Doyle. You are so right that the rejection is not of the evidence. The rejection of God takes place first.

      I was thinking more about this topic yesterday. What if we came across a time machine or a transporter or converter that changed garbage into energy. Would we think, Wow, how cool that this thing we have only imagined accidentally came together. Of course not. We’d want to know what superior thinker/designer figured out a way to create such advanced technology. Why? Because we understand that order does not come from disorder. It would never cross our minds to think a drone came into being because of some accident. We understand that behind inventions there is an inventive mind who came up with the idea and brought it into being.

      Why, then, would this world be any different? The only answer is the one you gave. Those who see “accident” when they look at the world have already denied the existence of the Creator.

      Becky

      Like

  3. Great post! Only a fool could not believe in an ultimate creator of the universe. There are only mere theories to reject the existence of a creator. I look at the sky, ground, dirt, sea and space above as proof of a God. Everything happens for a reason.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Scripture agrees: “The fool has said in his heart, ‘There is no god.’ ” So amazing the theories that are thrown out there, especially recently with string theory and the multiverse. All kinds of ideas as people try to understand the cosmos. But they’re starting in the wrong place. In the beginning, God . . .

      Becky

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve always had difficulty with the atheist/agnostic notion that if enough pure-chance accidents take place over the right number of millions of years, an advanced level of order will result. It’s like believing that if you crash cars into one another long enough, in time you will get an improved model car.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Precisely, Nissa. It doesn’t work in any observable incidents, so why would anyone think it’s magically the way all of the universe came into being?

      Becky

      Like

  5. Great post!! I always think of Mr. hawkins’ statement, “because such a thing as the law of gravity exists the universe can and will create itself”. I always wonder how this “law of gravity” came into existence of which the existence of the entire universe is dependent on?..LOL. Great post!!!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Point well made! I agree completely. To me, it seems that Mr. Hawking and his ilk quite obviously recognize the “law” but refuse to recognize the “lawgiver”. Like a toddler who hears Daddy’s warnings but doesn’t want to heed, the moment will come when their obstinate defiance will be made clear to them. I pray that they will realize their defiance before it is too late.

      Liked by 2 people


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: