Jesus And Suffering

I’ve been thinking a lot about suffering of late because, as I mention earlier this week, this year marks the 50th anniversary of Joni Eareckson Tada’s diving accident that left her paralyzed. And, “coincidentally” a friend lent me a book that Joni wrote twenty years ago on the subject of suffering.

I checked out the book on Amazon the other day when I wrote about it for this blog, and I was stunned to find a one-star review. Stunned, I tell you! I think of Joni as the quintessential expert on the subject of suffering. I mean, fifty years a quadriplegic, but on top of that a cancer survivor and now one ravaged by the pain of a body suffering from its own immobility.

So, yes, I think Joni knows what she’s talking about when she addresses the subject of suffering.

But even what she has endured pales in comparison to what Jesus experienced.

His whole life was a kind of suffering because He “emptied Himself” when He took the likeness of Man (see Phil. 2). Scholars debate the meaning of that phrase, but one thing we can be sure of—it ain’t positive. He wasn’t enriched by the experience, He wasn’t having a picnic, He wasn’t going on vacation. In some way, the incarnation cost Him. From the beginning.

People will sometimes reference Christ’s humble surroundings at birth—the feeding trough, the stable, with the presumed accompanying smells and sounds. But I think that’s kind of missing the point. God was now a baby boy. He did all the normal things that babies do. He likely spit up, maybe sucked His thumb, slept a lot.

This is God we’re talking about—the One who sustains the universe with a word. But now His words were baby sounds. Now those are humble beginnings. And a type of suffering we can’t know.

Things never got easier for Jesus. He went from insignificant to misunderstood, rejected, betrayed, and denied. Oh, and then He was crucified.

Jesus knew all about suffering. He’s the one who shows us how God can use suffering.

I think of the Christians in Syria who are persecuted for their faith, and to the surprise of many in the West, more and more people are coming to Christ. Would they have done so it their lives were easy?

Think about the start of Christianity. After that initial response to Peter’s sermon on the day of Pentecost, suffering set in. Persecution. Martyrdom. Exile. And things only got worse. Certain Roman Caesars set out to eliminate Christians from their empire. Their ways of killing them were horrific and painful.

Did all that suffering stop the movement of God in the hearts of people? Not at all. In truth, those who had nothing, whose very lives hung in a balance spoke out boldly and pressed themselves to the Father’s side. The only comfort and joy and peace came from Jesus, not their circumstances. And they simply couldn’t be silent.

Joni Eareckson Tada reminds me of that. Her joy and peace and contentment have little to do with her physical life. Oh, sure, things could be worse than they are. I mean she could be homeless and without the necessities of life.

Oh, wait, there are Christians like that, too, and they still exhibit the joy of the Lord. How can that be? It’s not an issue of mind over matter or us pulling ourselves up by our own positive thinking. It’s actually all about the reality of Jesus Christ—His supremacy and His sweetness.

John Piper explains in this 8-minute video entitled “What Is the Secret of Joy in Suffering?”


Does God Mean What He Says?

I read another article on what the author characterized as the Bell/Piper divide, referring to the ideas set forth in Rob Bell’s promotional video for his book Love Wins and John Piper’s Twitter response. The author’s conclusion was that the debate which centers on heaven, hell, and who is saved, depends on hermeneutics, or how one goes about interpreting the Bible.

Probably so.

I’ll admit, it’s not my field. I took a look at the article about this discipline the blogger referred to, and quickly felt overwhelmed. It seems our understanding of the Bible depends on our philosophical outlook, our cultural background, and the ideologies we embrace.


How does faith like that of a child which Jesus referred to, fit in with hermeneutics?

Is the Bible too hard for the average person to grasp, or is its meaning ever changing because it is part of a “living tradition,” one that “is fundamentally a matter of perceiving a moving horizon, engaging a strand of dialogue that is an on-going re-articulation of the dynamically historical nature of all human thought.”

Perhaps all human thought is moving and changing, but God’s thoughts are the same yesterday, today, and forever. Or so He says about Himself in the Bible. Did He mean it?

As I look at this issue, it seems to me we may believe either that the Bible did indeed come from the inspiration of God’s Spirit and reveals what He wants Mankind to know about His person, His plan, and His work in the world, or we can believe the Bible is a book many authors wrote about their perceived experiences with God.

The latter is open to much interpretation. Some portions of it might be myth or conjecture. And what we do with what the Bible says is determined in part by how it impacts each individual.

The former establishes the Bible as the authoritative source to which we can go when we want to know about things like heaven, hell, and who can be saved.

But here’s the thing we must not lose sight of. If God wrote it, He wrote it all. We can’t isolate verses and camp on them as the One Truth by which we live. I’ve seen people do that. Last year I wrangled with another blogger because he believed his Christianity called him to ridicule false teachers. Not love his neighbor or his enemy or treat all men with gentleness—none of the things Jesus commanded His followers to do. Somehow he rationalized away his disregard for those scriptures and focused on just that One Thing.

I’ve seen other take a handful of verses and explain away any contradictions, thus formulating a doctrine that a plain reading of Scripture can’t sustain.

Did God mean what He said, or did He speak in code or perhaps symbology, so that “narrow way” actually means “broad” and “separate” actually means “unite”? Perhaps “accursed ones” mean “beautiful children” and “eternal fire” means “everlasting bliss.”

Or did Jesus really mean what He said:

Then [the King] will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels … These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
– Matt. 25:41, 46

Published in: on March 4, 2011 at 2:20 pm  Comments (7)  
Tags: , , , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: