My Take On Cloth And Wineskins

Have you every been bugged by a portion of Scripture? It just doesn’t seem to fit or make sense in light of what you know or in light of the context?

I’ve struggled in this way with a passage in the book of Matthew. Let me give you the context. Jesus began his public ministry and quickly incurred the ire of the Jewish religious leaders because more than once He healed people on the Sabbath. After calling Matthew to be His disciple, He went home with him for dinner. The Pharisees complained about Him eating and drinking with tax-collectors (corrupt government officials) and sinners (those who didn’t keep the Jewish law). Jesus told them to “go and learn what this means: ‘I DESIRE COMPASSION, AND NOT SACRIFICE’…”

Soon after John’s disciples and those of the Pharisees observed a religious fast. John’s disciples asked Jesus why His disciples didn’t fast, too.

Now His answer.

And Jesus said to them, “The attendants of the bridegroom cannot mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them, can they? But the days will come when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast. (9:15)

I get that. So far so good. But He continued:

“But no one puts a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment; for the patch pulls away from the garment, and a worse tear results. Nor do people put new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the wineskins burst, and the wine pours out and the wineskins are ruined; but they put new wine into fresh wineskins, and both are preserved.” (9:16-17)

Huh?

How did we get from eating with sinners and not keeping a fast, to cloth and wineskins?

Well, obviously, as with the previous part of His answer about the bridegroom, Jesus is making an analogy, but what equals what?

I’ve heard sermons on this passage before and usually the point is this: the old is the Law, the new, the New Covenant. Set aside for the moment that those to whom Jesus was talking would not have understood that analogy at all. The idea of the New Covenant was still just that—an idea. Most people had no clue why the Messiah had actually come.

But the real problem I have here is that the new wine bursts the old wineskin, and both are lost. In addition, the new cloth patch on the old garment in Jesus’s analogies ruins what it was intended to repair.

Yet Jesus clearly said in the Sermon on the Mount that He did not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it.

“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. (Matt. 5:17-18)

My thoughts about the cloth and wineskins analogy came clear to me as I read a passage in Mark where Jesus elaborates on the problem He had with the Pharisees:

(For the Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they carefully wash their hands, thus observing the traditions of the elders; and when they come from the market place, they do not eat unless they cleanse themselves; and there are many other things which they have received in order to observe, such as the washing of cups and pitchers and copper pots.) The Pharisees and the scribes asked Him, “Why do Your disciples not walk according to the tradition of the elders, but eat their bread with impure hands?” And He said to them, “Rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written:

‘This people honors Me with their lips,
But their heart is far away from Me.
‘But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’

Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.” (Mark 7:3-9 – emphasis mine)

The Pharisees were adding onto the Law, changing what God had given by adding in their new regulations. So back in Matthew, what if the old cloth and the old wineskins stand for God’s true Law? In the verses just prior to these analogies, remember, Jesus told the Pharisees to figure out what Scripture meant when it said God desired compassion rather than sacrifice.

God’s Law was actually to love Him and to love our neighbors.

The new patch of cloth, the new wine, then, represent the traditions the Pharisees heaped on top of what God had said. Their add-ons were tearing apart the fabric, bursting the skins, of God’s perfect Law.

I know this way of looking at these verses flies in the face of the traditional interpretation. Traditional … heh-hem. Maybe that’s not a bad thing because I think it fits the context of the passage and is consistent with what Jesus says about fulfilling God’s law and about the Pharisees’ perversion of it through their tradition.

In the end, I come away more mindful of the need to hold loosely things like worship styles and other extra-Biblical practices. Compassion must not be sacrificed on the altar of tradition.

This article is a reworking of one that first appeared here in May, 2012.

Advertisements
Published in: on April 3, 2019 at 5:55 pm  Comments (5)  
Tags: , , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/2019/04/03/my-take-on-cloth-and-wineskins-2/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Worth thinking about. Thank you for sharing your interpretation with us.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I like this, Becky! Well said.

    It also reminds me of the saying that often the hardest thing for Christians to do is “unlearn” Often people have set ideas in their heads about some bit of scripture they don’t understand or the words of some pastor they may have misunderstood. If you can keep an open mind, have a teachable spirit, then the Lord will unwrap revelations for you.

    Someone once told me heaven was sitting on a cloud playing harp music for all of eternity. That got so stuck in my mind, I simply decided I wasn’t going to heaven at all. A bit of a funny example perhaps, but I had to “let go of the old” and consider the possibility that God knew what He was doing with heaven, that perhaps I had a misconception. In a way it was just as you said, “add-ons were tearing apart the fabric, bursting the skins.” The bible says nothing about how we become cherubs when we die, bored to tears and sitting on a cloud. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • Your heaven example is a good one, IB. You’re not alone thinking that false image of heaven was true . . . and not really wanting to go there. I didn’t want to go to hell either, so I just figured I’d stay here! Until I divorced myself from the false notions. Which, as you’re illustration, isn’t easy to do.

      Becky

      Liked by 1 person

  3. My thinking on this has been that we are the wineskins and Jesus and His Spirit are the wine. I think Jesus was making reference to the Pharisees being born again – of the Spirit. Otherwise, sharing with them the wisdom of the New would frustrate them and their attachment to the old.

    I think saying it within that context of their question why His disciples didn’t observe the fast, was to say that they didn’t have the mind to understand why He and His disciples were free from observing the practices of those still in the mindset of the Old Law and traditions.

    Just my thoughts. Good post ☺

    Like

  4. Wow, interesting take, and it makes sense. I always had a hard time with this passage, too.

    Liked by 1 person


Leave A Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: