Christian Fiction Must Be . . . You Know, Christian; Or, The Shack Is Back

This past week, I saw the TV add for the upcoming The Shack movie. I’d seen the trailer some time ago, but was dismayed that the promotion was reaching a TV audience. And in LA. We don’t often hear about “Christian” projects here.

There’s no doubt that The Shack positions itself as Christian. After all, Jesus shows up, albeit in imaginary form. But is it Christian?

What constitutes “Christian fiction”? That’s a question we at Spec Faith have answered and revisited since our inception some ten years ago (see for example this early post by one of the founding members of Spec Faith).

Not only have writers and readers debated what constitutes Christian fiction, and particularly Christian speculative fiction, we’ve debated the rightness of and the need for good doctrine in our fiction (see for example “Reading Choices: Realism, Truth, And The Bible“). “Doctrine” encompasses both theology and beliefs concerning morality, and we’ve discussed those too (see for example “Marcher Lord Press and the Hinterlands Imprint“).

On top of these generalized discussions, we’ve also posted articles and comments specifically about The Shack. But that was eight years ago, when the book was still on the top of best-selling lists and Christians and non-Christians alike were passing it around from one person to another and discussing it over coffee.

Now the movie version of Paul Young’s book is about to come to a theater near you, and the question no one could answer back then is bound to resurface: Is The Shack truly Christian?

There are some specific issues that came under scrutiny concerning the book.

Some people stumbled over the most glaring issue right from the gate. I mean, isn’t it blasphemous to depict God the Father as anything but a Father?

I understand how portraying God as other than how He portrays Himself, can be troublesome. At the same time, I can see how others accept “God’s” explanation: that He needed to reveal Himself to the main character in a way he could receive Him.

That being said, I suggest one of the central problems of the story surfaces within the discussion of this rather peripheral issue. The Shack has little use for the Bible. Hence, God the Father is easily replaced by the needs of the character.

There are other major issues—the attitude toward the Church and universal salvation and an understanding of the Trinity.

Yet more than one Christian has reported how life changing The Shack was for them, how they wept as they read it, how they understood God’s forgiveness in a way they never had before.

So . . . is it Christian?

Can it be Christian if it shows God in ways He does not show Himself? If it does not point people to His word or His body, the Church? If it falsely claims universal salvation?

On the other hand, how can it not be Christian if it gave many believers renewed faith and deeper love for God and a deeper understanding of forgiveness?

On one hand, The Shack may not tick all the intellectual, theological boxes, but on the other, it more than makes up for that lack by the emotional, spiritual juice it provides.

In thinking about the “what makes something Christian” question, I have to look at the object itself, not the results that may come from it.

The Apostle Paul did just the opposite when he was imprisoned in Philippi and a bunch of so-called Christian brethren started preaching. Paul identified their motives as envy and strife and selfish ambition (Phil. 1:15, 17), but he basically said, so what? As long as they preached Christ, who cared that they had bad motives?

the former proclaim Christ out of selfish ambition rather than from pure motives, thinking to cause me distress in my imprisonment. 18 What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed; and in this I rejoice. (vv 17-18a)

Paul was only concerned with the bottom line: the result. These “brethren,” false or true, were telling people about Jesus.

So, isn’t that the best test? Shouldn’t we be applauding The Shack, if the movie is successful, because it is bringing people to Christ?

I said above that I have to look at the object itself, because my question is, Is The Shack truly Christian? Lots of things can bring people to Christ. War has been known to do so. A friend of mine came to Christ by reading a novel. Others look at the heavens and know they need to find the One who made them. After 9/11, here in the US any number of people turned to God in the midst of their fear and uncertainty.

Would we say war is “Christian” because some soldiers reported coming to Christ when faced with their own mortality? No, certainly not. God can and does use whatever means He wishes, but His use of the thing does not baptize it as emblematic of His Good News.

So I reject the idea that The Shack must be Christian because people report a deeper relationship with God after having read it.

When Paul talked about those so-called brethren in Philippi, he gave no indication that they were preaching anything but what was true about Christ. Elsewhere, however, he addressed those who were not preaching the truth.

For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. Therefore it is not surprising if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness, whose end will be according to their deeds. (2 Cor. 11:13-15)

In writing to the Galatians he also brought up the matter:

But it was because of the false brethren secretly brought in, who had sneaked in to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, in order to bring us into bondage. (Gal 2:4)

Clearly, Paul was not hesitant to call out those who were not preaching the gospel but who were masquerading as if they were fellow believers. The same is true throughout the Bible about false teachers and false prophets. Jesus Himself made some of the strongest statements about “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” about false prophets misleading many, even about false Christs.

So determining who is and who isn’t a Christian, what is and what isn’t true Christian teaching, seems like an important aptitude.

Yet I know people will hold back for fear of judging. We aren’t supposed to judge each other, are we?

We’re not.

But that doesn’t mean we’re to put our brains on hold, either. We can still think. We can still look at the story on the screen and compare it with what the Bible says. Which is, after all, the unchanging, authoritative Truth by which we know what “Christian” means.

This article is a re-post of the one I published today at Speculative Faith.

Published in: on February 20, 2017 at 5:45 pm  Comments (11)  
Tags: , , ,


  1. I appreciated that article, Becky! It’s actually a really tough question and one that’s often hard to answer, too.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a “Christian” movie that I didn’t have a theological issue with. Kind of funny, I can’t even say “Christian” movie without supplying some quotations.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Good point about theological issues in other movies labeled Christian, IB. The thing that I’m troubled with . . . well, the things, include this: if we believers, knowing the Good News, can’t discern who is or isn’t speaking Truth, how is the world to know? I think clearly God is the One Who enlightens and takes the blinders off, but still, aren’t we to expose the deeds of darkness? I can’t help but think that telling people they have no guilt, that all are saved, is a lie that needs to be confronted.

      I thought about Priscilla and Aquila confronting Apollos to instruct him in the better way. He apparently embraced the truth without hesitation. I would be delighted if I saw this movie and realized all hints at universalism had been scrubbed. That would be outstanding!


      Liked by 1 person

  2. Good post! We are supposed to judge each other, but with a warning: the measure you use will also be used against you. I think it is well worth the measure to judge movies and books that ‘lead’ people into a deeper understanding of God. Unfortunately, universalism isnt taught in the bible. I’ll still see it. But I cant see it as a Christian movie.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Exactly. And I think we’re always to pay attention to what we ingest intellectually, comparing it to the Truth of the Bible. It’s the “testing the spirits” for which the Bereans were commended: “for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11b).



  3. Thank you for a very clear and helpful essay. J.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Examine all things (by the Scriptures), hold fast to the truth. Thanks for this post.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Amen! Thanks for the succinct statement by which we should approach fiction. Or other forms of art or culture. Very clear.



  5. Dear Becky,
    Thanks for the article and writing with such clarity. We’re living in an age when confusion and deception is rampant, and I pray not to be deceived. I don’t know if I’ll see this movie, as I was confused by the book. (And I hate that feeling.It reminded me of modern art-all confused blobs of paint.) But, as you mention, many were helped spiritually by it. And many see things in blobs of paint that I don’t.

    What to think probably depends on where we are in the spiritual journey. There was a time when I may have liked the book, and God may have used it to draw me closer to the truth. He used Alexander Solzhenitsyn and other authors to do that. But God gives us more knowledge and wisdom as our hair grows gray and we have to live by the truth as it is revealed to us. For now and forever, all I need is contained in the Bible.

    Great thoughts in this article! Really got me thinking.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Rosanne, most writers I know had issues with The Shack because it was so poorly written, whether they also saw in it poor or false content. It was not an easy book for that reason.

      But deception is really the problem, I think. Some things in the book were true—particularly God’s great love for us. But other parts were misleading or false, and I think the author purposefully brushed past certain things as a way to plant ideas without having to defend them rigorously. He made statements that can only be interpreted as universal salvation, for example. He put the Church in a bad light. He suggested that the Bible traps us in guilt. He clearly said God will be to each of us what we need him to be (as opposed to who He actually is).

      But God is greater than all our sin, so He has used this book to bring some to Himself. My prayer is that the parts that are false may fall away and be lost and only what is true will penetrate the hearts and minds of those who see the movie.

      Thanks for your thoughtful comments.



  6. When The book came out I was a rigid believer. I made people uncomfortable, they called me baby Billy Graham. I went to church, led worship, taught bible study. My brother, who had been badly treated in a church because he didn’t speak in tongues “Therefore he was not saved” had been running. While The Shack offended me at times and actually I didn’t finish it, it Led my brother straight back to Jesus. When He passed away four years ago at the age of 54 I rested in the knowledge of his home coming. I am NOW not so religious nor so rigid. I error on the side of love and mercy, over judgment. I don’t think it’s my place to tell others how to live. I only want to show the world my Jesus, who has forgiven me so much. So I can’t wait to see the movie. I think anything that leads us to Jesus, anything that is full of mercy and grace and love is JUST fine by me.


    • Lynn, I think your perspective is much like that of many others. But here’s my problem: the teaching in The Shack is that all will be saved, that the Bible traps us in guilt, that God is whoever we need him to be. These things are a different gospel from that taught in Scripture. While some people can see beyond them to the truth, others well might be deceived by them.

      I am so happy to hear stories like the one you shared about your brother. Praise God that He used even the foolishness of man to bring your brother to Himself.



Comments are closed.