We’re Going About It Backwards

california_academy_of_sciences_san_francisco_2013_-_16Like so many other things, the Church swings and sways on a pendulum, shifting from one extreme to the next in our effort to follow the path of truth our God set down for us in His word. The Reformation, for example, was a correction that brought the pendulum swinging back to the belief in grace and forgiveness, not law and rule keeping.

Another clear shift came in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries when the social gospel replaced the fire-and-brimstone emphases of the Great Awakening preachers.

The Social Gospel movement emerged among Protestant Christians to improve the economic, moral and social conditions of the urban working class. (“The Social Gospel Movement: Definition and Goals of Urban Reform Movements”)

And much needed to be improved in both America and other western civilizations. The Industrial Revolution was in full swing, and the urban poor were a growing population. How did the Church respond? First, there was no unified approach to the changes in society. Protestants didn’t even agree with one another, let alone with Catholics. Two factions formed among Protestants, the one

focused on saving individual souls; in revivals in the rapidly expanding cities, they attempted to get people to turn away from their own sins and to embrace personal salvation. The [other] party focused on the sins of society, such as poverty and inequality, and asked people to seek salvation through building “the Kingdom of God on this earth.” Through the 1880s and 1890s, the [former] raced ahead of the [latter] in popularity and public appeal.

Each of the groups was evangelical, meaning that they drew their message from the Bible, and each of them focused on redemption. But their objects of concern were very different. (“The Social Gospel And The Progressive Era”)

Around the turn of the century the pendulum swung toward those focused on correcting the sins of society. Organizations arose and articles were written.

But two world wars and a Great Depression doused the hope that society was self-correcting and the injustices of capitalism were stemmed. The pendulum swung again, back toward personal salvation.

Now we find ourselves in another shift. The pendulum is moving again toward the remedy for societal ills. We are to love our neighbors as ourselves, we’re reminded. And we are the “hands and feet of Jesus,” we’re informed. In the past we aimed to carry the gospel to foreign lands but neglected our own urban poor.

These are all true, and the swinging pendulum does, perhaps, need to move back toward the center. But there’s one major problem. We seem to be leaving out the most important component, the first and greatest command, Jesus called it: we are to love the Lord our God with our whole being.

Before we are to take the gospel across the ocean or across the street, before we are to volunteer at the homeless shelter or donate to the fund for Haiti, we are to love God.

Deuteronomy expands the response we’re to have to God by adding “fear Him”—that is, have an awe, a reverence for Him. Throughout the book, God’s people, newly escaped from Egypt, were instructed in God’s ways. They repeatedly received instruction to pay attention to their relationship with God, and then to go about serving and obeying.

They weren’t to serve and to obey first. They were to love and to fear first. But here’s the key:

Loving God and obeying His commandments don’t happen because we try harder. Loving God is a response to His first loving us. Obeying God is a demonstration of our love for Him. The elements are entwined, and we confuse the issue when we try to separate one strand from the others.

Or if we forget which is the greatest command. (“The FIRST Commandment Is To Love God”)

In other words, loving God isn’t something we can isolate from obeying Him. Obeying God isn’t something we can isolate from loving Him. Or that we can put ahead of loving Him.

In short, there ought not be a swinging pendulum. We should not over emphasize personal salvation more than serving our neighbors. Unfortunately we’re in a period of time that threatens to de-emphasize salvation in favor of caring for the physical needs of those less fortunate than we are.

One ought not exclude the other. Neither should be emphasized at the expense of the other. Both are necessary to fulfill God’s commandments. We love God and then we serve Him. We fear God and then we obey Him.

How can we love God, fear Him, serve Him, obey Him, without telling others about Him? How can we love God, fear Him, serve Him, obey Him, without caring for the less fortunate?

God’s heart is for the most vulnerable—for the orphans and widows and poor and strangers.

He has told you, O man, what is good.
And what does the LORD require of you
But to do justice, to love kindness,
And to walk humbly with your God. (Micah 6:8)

But that’s not first.

Loving God is first.

Today I fear we’re going about things backwards. We are focused on programs and events, we’re challenged to do and to go, we’re encouraged to work and to serve. But where are the sermons about loving God?

Maybe more churches have pastors helping worshipers fall in love with God and His word. Maybe there’s a renewed interest in prayer groups. Maybe Bible studies are gaining traction again. Maybe Sunday evening church services are taking place in other parts of the country. I don’t know.

All I know is, if the greatest commandment is to love God with all of our being, why don’t we spend more time focused on loving God than on doing good works?

Published in: on October 28, 2016 at 7:10 pm  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , , ,


  1. Yes,amen! I think of Jesus, He made sure everybody had lunch with fishes and loaves, which was a miracle all by itself, but it also addressed people’s immediate needs. Then He taught. Those crowds didn’t show up for lunch,they came to feed their souls.

    In the secular world of charity, we completely ignore people’s spiritual and emotional needs. So, “here’s 30 dollars in food stamps, see you next month.”

    The churchian world either totally copies the secular approach, “no pressure, no message” here’s a free lunch, or else they say, “Well,I’ll pray for you,” and than do nothing at all. Or worse,assume or presume that if people were just better Christians they wouldn’t have struggles.

    Both extremes are not ideal. I think we have to look to Christ and how He related to people, as whole people,having physical and spiritual needs, but a great deal of what He did was to show us all about loving God, about being in prayer, about having a relationship. Jesus spent 30 years preparing for what would be about a 3 year ministry, kind of the reverse of how we do things today.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Excellent Rebecca.

    You may be surprised to learn that my view is that the church has been grotesquely remiss in it’s duty toward justice and charity. Which is of course a symptom of a lack of real love for God.

    In this country anyway the church seems to think that an envelope on Sunday and or a vote for some liberation Marxist political agenda constitutes biblical justice and charity.

    When the saints are spending more of THEIR OWN time and money on others than themselves, we will be in the ballpark.

    There’s enough money and time in the American church to induce the death of the welfare state by natural causes through lack of need. It’ll never happen. The vast majority of professing Christians on this continent spend FAAAAR more time and money on TV, movies, sports and music than they do on any of the New Testament mandates to charity and justice. Or anything else God commands, like evangelism for instance.

    Speaking of movies, THIS was an actually good one and that scene is the answer to racial division. Not in the world, because there will never be an answer there. The people of the one true and living God must show them what it looks like and we will. Just let that persecution heat up and purge the pretenders and the true body of Christ will gather around that cross no matter what color anybody is. It’s coming.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Your post reminds me of the time Jesus visited Martha and Mary. Mary sat at his feet, listening to him. Martha was busy serving him and the others who came with him. She wanted Jesus to tell Mary to help her with the work. Jesus did not scold Martha–works of service are good–but Jesus gently told her that Mary had chosen the better thing. Too many American congregations today are run by Marthas who do not understand the Marys among them. J.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: