The Christian’s Responsibility Regarding False Teaching

False teaching, as was so clearly illustrated in the articles about dominionism and the responses from readers which I cited yesterday, has far reaching effects. I’ve been slow to recognize that Christians, like someone standing on the sidewalk when a car splashes through a muddy puddle, end up sprayed and splattered by false teachers and their followers.

I should have known different. After all, Scripture spells out the harm that false teaching does, to those who buy into it and to the true Church:

But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. Many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep. (2 Peter 2:1-3 – emphasis mine)

Seems to me, because of the destructive nature of false teaching and because God and His Truth are maligned as a result of it, Christians ought not stand idly by.

But if we take it upon ourselves to correct false teachers, what’s to prevent us from becoming like the hateful Westboro Baptist people who picket funerals with signs bearing offensive messages?

Not that there isn’t a place for rebuke. There is. 2 Peter goes on to say

forsaking the right way, they have gone astray, having followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness; but he received a rebuke for his own transgression, for a mute donkey, speaking with a voice of a man, restrained the madness of the prophet. (2 Peter 2:15-16)

OK, in Balaam’s case, no one else was around to rebuke him, so God opened the mouth of his donkey. Rebuke would seem to be a vital part of handling false teaching.

But there appears to be a difference between rebuke and reviling. Peter and Jude both make a point of saying that even the angels don’t dare bring a reviling judgment on false teachers.

Jude actually gives a blueprint to the Christian for handling false teaching:

But you, beloved, building yourselves up on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting anxiously for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to eternal life. And have mercy on some, who are doubting; save others, snatching them out of the fire; and on some have mercy with fear, hating even the garment polluted by the flesh. (vv 20-23)

The first admonition is for believers to focus on our own spiritual walk — our faith, our prayer life, our love of God, our expectant hope for eternal life.

In addition, there are some to whom we are to show mercy — those who are doubting. I suspect this may refer to those who have been subject to false teaching and consequently have doubts. How can we extend them mercy? Certainly not by picketing funerals. But we can pray. We can live lives of faith. We can testify to God’s goodness and the truth of His world. We can also be forgiving rather than easily offended.

Others we are to snatch out of the fire. James 5:19-20 comes to mind:

My brethren, if any among you strays from the truth and one turns him back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.

How do you turn someone back from the error of his way? I suspect only someone who has a relationship with a person straying from the truth can effect this change. In the parlance of the world, this might be an intervention. In Biblical terms, it would be “going to a brother” as described in Matthew 18.

With some we are to have “mercy with fear, hating even the garment polluted by the flesh.” Strong language, but it seems to me these are pictures of running away, not fighting against.

Our act of mercy would be what? I’m not sure. I do know that extending mercy is not something hateful or oppressive. But doing so with fear and hating even the outward manifestation of sinfulness doesn’t sound like we’re having coffee with those caught up in false teaching.

In other words, it seems there’s a point when someone is pulled in so far that we are not to pursue them, or if we do, we should tread carefully, mindful of the quicksand we’re edging toward, mercifully willing to throw a line, but hating the grime so much we stay clear of it ourselves.

Published in: on October 19, 2011 at 5:56 pm  Comments (2)  
Tags: , , , ,


  1. Wow! This is such a great article. In some of my facebook groups the question is now, “Do we call a person on it and name names?” Especially if it’s a large or small or far-reaching ministry. Such a quandary because one doesn’t want to gossip. And human hearts being what they are, when you challenge someone in public, (even if they continue to be wrong after the private rebuke) folks are not gonna forgive being publicly challenged or called out. Just such a hard thing to deal with. Right now, the sacred name movement, the headcovering movement, the universalist-even-satan-will-be-saved movement are just a few gaining momentum even among true Bible believers.


  2. Thanks, Carole. I agree that this issue is very hard.

    I think there are times that we need to confront, but I think there are probably a lot more times we simply need to say boldly what the Bible says. It’s an amazingly relevant book.

    In Colossians, for example, Paul spends the better part of chapter one declaring who Christ is (the exact image of the invisible God, the one who redeems us, the One by whom, for whom, and through whom all things were created, and on and on). Then in chapter two he says, “I say this so that no one will delude you through persuasive argument.” The point is, Paul saw the protection for false teaching to be the focus on who Jesus is!

    He says the same thing again a few verses later in Col. 2. Verse 8, I think. It’s Christ, not philosophy or empty deception based on traditions of men or the elementary principles of of the world, upon which we should focus.

    I wonder how different life would be if we the Church set our minds on Christ in that way.



Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: