For a long time “edgy” was a buzz word in Christian fiction. I frequently scoffed (or railed or ranted — take your pick 😉 ) at the term because those using it seemed oblivious to what the world considers edgy.
For example, a few months back, in doing some agent research, I ran across an interview with a fantasy writer. Besides comments about her agent, she discussed her latest work. At one point the interviewer asked about one part of the story. The writer admitted she thought she’d get dinged by reviewers because of the edgy content, but surprisingly, no. The scene in question? A human character having sex with his dragon. Her conclusion? With sex, anything goes these days.
I find that content and that conclusion disgusting, but not surprising. This is the “edgy” the world knows — the boundary-pushing against society’s acceptable. Or not. As this author noted, including bestiality in her novel didn’t raise anyone’s ire. Apparently the edge has moved beyond kinky sex. What’s next?
What drives this mad dash to the edge seems to be the pursuit of the new and different. “Fresh” is another term bandied about. Our entertainment-driven (read hedonistic) culture must have the Something that feels like it’s never been done before. We crave that thing that will pique our curiosity, give us a jolt of excitement, cause us to wonder, take us out of our mundane state and transport us Elsewhere. We want to live in a constant state of orgasm.
Once these desires were the signs of mid-life crisis. Now the entire society seems to suffer from perennial adolescent angst, a chasing after Anything, as long as it isn’t boring or ordinary.
In literature we no longer want to be hooked by the end of the first chapter or by the first page, first paragraph, or first line. We must now be hooked by the cover. If it’s not eye-catching, or somehow “sexy,” then it simply is not a good book. Yes, covers are now to be judged because we need to excite buyers before they ever put their hands on the product.
The question is, should we Christians play along? In his most recent blog post “Pushing Your Imagination Envelop” author and friend Mike Duran said
Maybe more than anything else, our culture’s “unacknowledged legislators” [storytellers] are looking for big ideas, new twists, and innovative slants. Yes, it’s evidence that our culture is growing increasingly jaded. But for those of us who traffic in imagination, it’s also evidence that the bar has been raised.
So if you think you’ve nailed your story premise, before you do anything else, find the limits of your credulity, the edges of your imagination envelope and… push it [boldface emphasis added].
I can’t help but wonder if the bar hasn’t been lowered, not raised. Once, writers like George Herbert, John Donne, John Bunyan, Edmund Spencer, and Alexander Pope wrote with “great depth” as a result of their “immersion in Christian and Biblical culture” (see Wikipedia articles on these authors). Now, it seems “great depth” comes from our great imagination.
True, an imaginative work like The Shack by Paul Young caught the fancy of those looking for something startling, even shocking. But depth? There was plenty of imagination, certainly, but little truth. Lots of “edgy” theology slamming against the Bible’s authority.
As I see it, truth puts parameters around our imagination. Our sinful, deluded hearts can conceive of all sorts of evil, and the world seems eager to trundle after the most repugnant fare being offered.
Christians, however, aren’t wandering aimlessly about. We aren’t in search of a quick fix, don’t need to live for the next thrill ride, the next mind-numbing gimmick. We don’t need to medicate our sorrows or drown our pain. Or we ought not.
You adulteresses, do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? Therefore, whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God (James 4:4).
Now there’s an edgy premise.
This is what I discussed (ranted) on this site before–edgy has a dangerous ring. Were not discussing simply showing a glass of brandy in a characters hands or a cigarette dangling from the mouth of a good character; no, edgy means exactly what it says and it has always worried and disgusted me. How edgy will a person go to sell a book or to “sell” the idea of Jesus to an unbeliever? I’m fine with edgy if edgy means nothing that perverts the mind or encourages a brother to stumble (so to speak)…a cheating husband, a divorce, a living together type of story, but the story must have a purpose for showing that like a before and after of a photo shoot. How will the character change and in that unique situation of living together how does the new person in Christ turn it around to lead a better life?
LikeLike
Great post on a subject that needed to be written on.
Because I rarely watch television I have a higher threshold of what I find shocking. It’s not that I cannot watch television it’s that I choose to read and keep up with that, not tv. When I do watch tv, I’m always shocked and disturbed by what I see: the language, sexual content, etc. And I too have wondered what will be next, it is scary.
LikeLike
I can’t help but wonder if the bar hasn’t been lowered, not raised. Once, writers like George Herbert, John Donne, John Bunyan, Edmund Spencer, and Alexander Pope wrote with “great depth” as a result of their “immersion in Christian and Biblical culture” (see Wikipedia articles on these authors). Now, it seems “great depth” comes from our great imagination.
That’s interesting. And a great thing to remember.
I don’t think Mike meant that our imaginations would give us great depth, but that they would give us wild new ways to package the depth. But I do agree with you that imagination is not what gives depth to our stories. The timeless truths of scripture give depth.
But I wonder if wild new ways to package truth don’t draw us up into the shallows. I wonder if all the lights and glitter and thrilling carnival rides don’t distract us so we can’t see the truth lying in the gutter, buried under the candy wrappers and crushed popcorn containers.
LikeLike
“As I see it, truth puts parameters around our imagination.”
Sorrowfully, we still think the worse thoughts – but its another thing to bring someone else into that fantasy.
From their callous hearts comes iniquity;
their evil imaginations have no limits. Psalm 73:7
LikeLike
… an imaginative work like The Shack by Paul Young caught the fancy of those looking for something startling, even shocking. But depth? There was plenty of imagination, certainly, but little truth. Lots of “edgy” theology slamming against the Bible’s authority.
Perhaps because I read it – and found it “deep” – at a time when I was struggling for answers, I had no trouble accepting the theology therein. Whether or not the theology was biblically accurate, it has helped many people to gain a better understanding of the Trinity. I know it did me; as well as being thoughtful and “entertaining”.
LikeLike
Wayne,
You said “I had no trouble accepting the theology therein. Whether or not the theology was biblically accurate…”
Shouldn’t you make sure it has Bible authority before you accept it? I’m curious to what better understanding of the Trinity you got from this book.
LikeLike
[…] to have Julie share some thoughts about writing especially in light of yesterday’s article, “Where Are We Going?” And as a double treat, I’ll be posting a review of Fade To Blue (available at Amazon, Barnes […]
LikeLike
Nikole, I agree — the edgy that the world refers to can show sin in all kinds of new light, but it’s still sin.
I understand that Christians generally use the term in reference to the edge of Christian norm, not the edge of societal norm. But I wanted to discuss what giving the sinful imagination free reign actually means.
Annette, thanks for your comment. I was away from TV for nearly three years (short term mission), and when I started watching again I was shocked! The shows I was shocked at, however, went into syndication and years later I started watching them regularly. We get immune to stuff that once disturbed. That, I believe, is how the spiral down in the pursuit of Something New works.
Becky
LikeLike
Sally, you said The timeless truths of scripture give depth. That’s it exactly.
I don’t think Mike was making a statement about depth at all. I found it telling, however, that these great Christians who were also great writers were known for their depth and that admittedly that depth came from their Christianity, their belief in the Bible.
No, I believe, as you said, he was talking about the packaging.
That was so well said, I just wanted to repeat it. 😀
Becky
LikeLike
Thanks for your comment, Bob. I love the verse you quoted — perfectly fits. You said, Sorrowfully, we still think the worse thoughts – but its another thing to bring someone else into that fantasy. That, I think, is what the writer must struggle with. When we show our characters as desperately wicked, are we revealing truth, bringing evil to the light of day, or are we inviting others into the world of our character’s wicked heart?
Some Christian writers show things in a very black and white way because they fear doing the latter. Some want to be so realistic they embrace the latter.
I think we need to back up a step and get a grip on what it is gives us quality. I don’t think it’s the next quirky monster. But maybe that’s just me.
Becky
LikeLike
Hi, Wayne, thanks for weighing in with your comments about The Shack. A couple years ago I did a ten part series looking at the book, primarily at the theology. I know most people — normal ones 😉 — just read it. The thing is, some points bothered me, and I wanted to reason out why. What I found was more troubling than I expected.
At the same time, I also saw why so many people took to the book. Sadly, a great many claiming the name of Christ never grasped God’s infinite love. This book featured His love, certainly, so it felt to many like a breath of fresh air.
The problem is, the things Paul Young said are the same things Rob Bell said in Love Wins, but because it was couched in fiction, a lot of readers swept on by the most troublesome statements.
Anyway, if you’re interested in taking a look at my analysis, you can see the first post here.
I’ll also add, I think Bob’s question is a good one. I find the Bible to be the only place I can rely on to give me what I need to know about God. What someone else imagines, like C. S. Lewis showing Narnia’s God figure as a lion, may help me understand Biblical truth, but that’s the key point. I need to check Scripture to see if what I’m understanding is what the Bible says.
Becky
LikeLike
[…] the other hand, I’ve recently written an article at my own blog stating that truth puts parameters around our imagination. Which suggests closing […]
LikeLike