Friends with the World

I’ve done a little blog surfing this morning, starting with Church Salt’s “Emerging from Emergents.” The trail led me to a conclusion I hadn’t expected: those identifying with the emerging church are on the decline.

Whether that conclusion is right or wrong, however, isn’t the issue. The thinking the emerging church re-instituted—contrary to the facade they portray to those “outside,” their thinking is little more than warmed over liberalism; they borrow generously from Orthodox Christianity, Gnostic thought, Eastern mysticism, even from a heretical ascetic such as Pelagius—this thinking has seeped into the Church.

One blog post claimed youth groups have espoused emerging church views for years. I wouldn’t doubt it.

But here’s the critical point. We American Christians must re-examine our hearts to see if we have left our First Love.

James, in his letter to Jewish believers scattered from Jerusalem because of persecution, gives a sobering warning:

You adulteresses, do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God.

– James 4:4

“Friendship with the world,” I would suggest, has a lot more to do with how we think than with what we do. In the previous verse, James addresses wrong motives, two verses down he speaks about pride.

Verse 5 he says something translators apparently have wrestled with without coming to a consensus. The New King James says it this way:

Or do you think that the Scripture says in vain, “The Spirit who dwells in us yearns jealously”?

In the context of “adultresses” in the last verse, this translation seems to me to make James’s intent clearest. As a husband would be jealous for his wife, so God is jealous for His Bride. And of course He wants our lives to be pure, but He also wants our hearts to be pure—free of wrong motives, without prideful self-will.

I have to believe that “friendship with the world,” then, includes the way we think.

Pastor Ray Stedman, in his commentary “James: The Activity of Faith” says this:

And if you stop believing what the Scriptures say, you will find yourself being drawn to the lies and the alluring illusion of the world around.

Drawn to the lies and illusion of the world seems to define the beliefs the emerging church has introduced. God is not a God of judgment. He is one with his creation. Hell isn’t real and Man does not sin by nature. Salvation is universal. Jesus came not as an atoning sacrifice but to show us a better way—the road of love and peace and unity.

How can I say these false teachings are in our churches? For one thing, I know these same views appear throughout The Shack, and its author, Paul Young, has spoken in the pulpit of any number of churches. I also know that Christians (as well as non-Christians) have raved about the book and its influence on their spiritual lives.

So … can a book, or a way of thinking, that helps people see God in a new way be bad? I mean, shouldn’t we want to know God in a fresh, exciting way?

Our thoughts about God can be new every morning, but I don’t believe we need to borrow from the world’s way of looking at Him to experience Him afresh. Just the opposite. Listening to the lies of the world will kill off true faith.

In the parable of the sower, that’s what happened to the seed that fell on stony ground. The soil was too shallow for roots to take hold.


  1. “Friendship with the world” and “the traditions of men” usher in the apostate church.


  2. Two sides of the same coin, aren’t they, Nicole. It’s amazing to me how quickly we buy into the ideas of the world while declaring the things of the Bible impossible fabrication—myth, at best.

    At the core is disbelief, I think. Disbelief that God really is all powerful and good, just and righteous altogether in all His judgments. The emerging thinker seems to believe God can be good unless He dons the mantle of Judge. Then he loses his goodness, which of course isn’t true, so he must not then be judge.

    Human logic, all built on the idea that it would be impossible for God to be both good and a just judge.

    Sorry … didn’t mean to get back up on my soapbox. Thought I finished with that. 😕



  3. That’s okay, Becky. It’s mind boggling. Many seem to think we “deserve” some kind of perfection here and now. Heaven isn’t tangible enough, and no one wants to wait for it or understand that getting there requires something of us. Sin makes those same people pony up a fake grace for every kind of sinful conduct and diminish the inevitable consequence(s) for the actions. Justice becomes man-made, varying from one man’s thoughts and rationalizations to another’s.

    Aahhh, geez, you got me up on that soap box too!


    • Heheh—there’s plenty of room atop the box. You’re welcome to join me. 😀



Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: