Safe Fiction – Part 3

Ironically, a program I occasionally listen to on the radio, Family Life Today, is running a series of broadcasts discussing fiction with author Tim Downs, winner of the 2007 Christy Award for best suspense novel of the year with PlagueMaker. Downs’ new novel, First the Dead, features protagonis Nick Polchak, a fornsic scientist (an entomologist, to be exact). I haven’t read the book, but from the radio discussion, I gleaned that these “bug book” stories could be considered a Christian version of CSI.

At the end of the first day of discussion, the radio host begins his wrap with something like, These books by Tim Downs are safe and entertaining, with a subtle message embedded. Safe? I’d already been thinking about this topic as the men discussed the research Downs did to understand what a crime scene entomologist would have to do, and how Downs tries to steer into the waters of reality without swamping the expectations of bookstore owners and vigilant, pietistic readers.

It was clear the radio host had read the book. In fact, he mentioned receiving a pre-release copy, but what he doesn’t know is, what each of the listeners and potential readers are dealing with in their lives. Is the book “safe” for someone like me who can’t watch CSI because of the gore? Is the book “safe” for someone who has experienced the ordeal of a murder in their family? Is the book “safe” for a five year old? a ten year old? a fifteen year old?

Those questions may strethch the point, but here’s what I’m getting at: in declaring a book “safe,” it seems to me, the radio host is giving a “G” rating, a blanket endorsement, and here is where an unsuspecting reader can become snagged.

Mind you, I know nothing about Downs’s First the Dead. Possibly, it is truly a book for all ages and stages, that no reader would have difficulty with any aspect of the story or the writing. That idea then prompts me to wonder if the “Christian” story isn’t a moralistic whitewashing of reality?

I suspect, instead, that there are hard looks at death between the covers of this novel. Downs indicated that one thing he wants to do with his fiction is “cross over,” to write a book that non-Christians might read, and leave them with questions to ask about … life, I suppose, or maybe after life.

What I’m wondering … really, what I’m doubting … is if one person can make a determination for another that a particular work is “safe.” Especially if that statement is aimed at millions of unknown listeners who tuned in to the radio on a particular morning.

As clarification, I’m a big fan of this program and the men behind the mic day in and day out. I think their stamp of approval, this declaration that Downs’s book is “safe,” was given with the best of intention. The host liked the book, likes Downs, and wanted to plug First the Dead with his audience, even though some of them might be the vigilant, pietistic readers who would squirm if a book in their local store contained cussing or sex or gratuitious violence.

It doesn’t have any of those, he seems to be saying, so come on in, the water’s fine.

What happens, then, to the discernment of individual readers? If the “expert” rules a work is “safe,” is that any better than relying on where the reader bought the book or the publisher’s imprint on the spine? In all these cases, the reader is relying on someone else to do his thinking. And frankly, I don’t find that safe at all.


  1. Becky, I’ve read all the Bug Man books, and you can read a review of First the Dead if you want on my blog. Here we go again, huh, with “safe” issues? This is not a “safe” novel for those who specifically need safe books to read. As you suggested, those who can’t stomach CSI will not appreciate the way Nick Polchak looks at death, the way the “floaters” and their appearances are described in this particular story. And in each of the Bug Man books, there is a sinister element, violence, and flawed (in the eyes of Christians) responses to a multitude of moral situations. I liked this novel the least of the three Bug Man books, and none of them are for kids.

    In my opinion Tim Downs has only written one Christian novel, the excellent Plague Maker. His other four novels belong in the general market. If you can catch his drift/subtle references to God, you’re a better reader than I am.


  2. I’d have to agree wholeheartedly. Everyone has their own weaknesses, and they are not the same as the next person. Something that tempts me might not tempt you. There are some things that we could declare universally safe because they fall firmly in line with biblical principles, but anytime you start mixing in worldly details, you void that warranty. Just because someone smacked the “Christian” label on it doesn’t mean I can (or should) let my guard down.


  3. >>>In all these cases, the reader is relying on someone else to do his thinking. And frankly, I don’t find that safe at all<<<

    Even the Bible is not safe when we let others do the thinking for us.


  4. Even the Bible is not safe when we let others do the thinking for us. Great point, Sally.

    Nicole, you’ll be interested in the lines I got from Tim Downs for today’s post since he specifically talked about this new book. I couldn’t help thinking about your comment.

    Well, to be honest, Kameron, I’d go one step farther. The books that are whitewashed and sanitized can still be unsafe for the person with the propensity to hide from the real world and not turn to God or trust Him in the midst of difficult times. “Safe” fiction can be deadly for the self-righteous who wags a finger at the rest of her church for indulging in the “sinful” pursuit of reading secular authors. Really, it’s all unsafe. The only safety we have is trusting Jesus one step at a time.



Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: