Hunter Brown and the Secret of the Shadow – A Review, CSFF Tour Day 2

As Rachel Starr Thomson so accurately points out in her CSFF Blog Tour post, Hunter Brown and the Secret of the Shadow by The Miller Brothers (Warner Press), first in the Codebearer Series, is actually the tip of a media iceberg, with related games and forums and videos as part of the Hunter Brown experience. One look at the Codebearer Web site reveals the broad and techno-savvy reach Christopher and Allan Miller are attempting. It is timely and certainly aimed perfectly at their target audience.

But the truth is, without a good story, none of the animation or challenges would draw in anyone. Fortunately, the Miller Brothers (Christopher and Allan) also know how to tell a good tale.

The Story. If you’ve read any of my reviews before, you know my story summaries are weak. To read a humorous synopsis of Hunter Brown and the Secret of the Shadow see Steve Rice’s post. For a good teaser, see the video Phyllis Wheeler and Jill Williamson posted or Valerie Comer included in her day 2 post (also available at the Codebearer site). And for a straightforward, excellent summary see Timothy Hicks’.

In short, this is a portal fantasy. A “rambunctious” high school freshman, on the last day of the school year, initiates a prank that leads to high adventure in another realm and to his own death, or so he says in his opening note. How could he die but still tell the tale? Though it seems impossible, in this story, it is not.

Strengths. Yesterday I mentioned one of the most important strengths, in my opinion. Christopher and Allan got Hunter Brown right. He is 15, I guess. (I saw that on two other blogs—I thought he was still 14), and he acts the part. He’s still into pranks and worried about bullies, but he’s noticing girls and concerned that he makes such bad first impressions; he’s cocky and at the same time uncertain. So many of the growing up things, but throw in the fact that Hunter isn’t even aware there is a spiritual life, and he’s the typical high school freshman guy.

Fittingly, this story is what I’ve termed adventure fantasy (because guys this age especially like adventure as a general rule). There are exciting exploits throughout, and Hunter is required to man-up. However, that doesn’t mean he is always to apply brute strength and courage or even cunning wit. Sometimes what he needs is humility. Sometimes he needs to be teachable. Sometimes he needs to be dependent.

Within the context of this fast-paced action, Christopher and Allan have embedded some great spiritual truth. Through the use of allegory (and I think I may post on that subject tomorrow), the authors connect various fantasy elements to reality. In so doing, they also tackle some of the deeper, knotty questions of our day. They address the evolution/creation issue, God’s sovereignty versus man’s free will, the problem of suffering. It’s an impressive and ambitious effort to deal with, not skirt, things that teens think about and want answers for, yet it is done naturally within the story, so I never had the sense that here were The Things the authors wanted to teach the reader.

Weaknesses. As John Otte noted in his day 1 post, there are some “craft” or editing problems in the book. Speaker attribution and action tags have been mixed and some minor point of view shifts occur. For some authors these were distracting. I noted them, and would have liked to see them cleaned up. For me, once I acknowledged that this was going to be the way this story was told, I didn’t give it another thought.

For me, the biggest problem was that I read the book so fast, I found I forgot it quickly. I first read the book back in December, but as the tour approached, I knew I’d need to look it over. I ended up reading it again. I think I’ll remember it much better now, but still, I wish I knew what makes a story memorable. I can’t put my finger on it. Two months after reading it, I knew I liked the book, but I couldn’t tell you anything about the story or the characters, as wonderful as I think they are.

Maybe we do reread our favorite books, which is what makes them memorable. Maybe we talk about them to others and that cements the story in our minds. And maybe I just waited too long to write my review, not wanting to give away anything in advance of the tour, or I would have remembered the book as it deserves. So maybe this weaknesss is in me.

Recommendation. A must read for tweener boys, for any young adult fantasy lovers, and I highly recommend it to anyone who enjoys portal adventure fantasy.

9 Comments

  1. [Side note, Becky. I try to write my reviews within 24 hours of finishing a novel. With as much reading as I do, and I’m sure yours is equally plentiful, if I don’t mark the memorable with my written words quickly, it all fades fairly fast. Simply because it’s on to the next book which requires a review. Only a few of the novels stick solidly in my mind and heart, and it’s usually because I truly enjoyed the writing/style itself.]

    Like

  2. Thanks for linking to me! I just got my own review up. This has been the most fun tour yet since I actually got to read the book!

    Like

  3. Yeah, there are many sentences I wish I coulda had go at, but I’m not so bothered by them that I couldn’t read the book. The story and the characters are interesting, and though technique could be improved, the storytelling itself was pretty good. I am confident that, if they surround themselves with good writers and editors, the guys will only get better.

    Like

  4. Oh, I am so bummed that I missed this tour. I want to read the book. Hmmm Guess I’ll just have to buy it. The free version on the Miller’s website is too small for my old eyes.

    Thanks for the review, Becky. I’m looking forward to making Hunter’s acquaintance.

    Like

  5. Nicole, good advice. I’ll try to keep that in mind. This time I actually didn’t mind because I think I got more out of the book by reading it again.

    Rachel, your review is excellent. Sorry I didn’t get that link up sooner. For some reason, Google isn’t picking up your blog (which is my first method of finding daily posts—from there on, it’s dicey).

    Keanan, a couple years ago, the kinds of things you’re talking about would have been a distraction to me as well. In particular, I remember reading a new release by a writer slated to speak in a series of fiction workshops, and I found all kinds of broken “writer rules.” But some seasoned writers blew past those, so I continued on with the story and found it was a good read. Not my favorite. Not an author I’ve read since, but not a story I hated. From that point on, I guess. Then there was J. K. Rowling who puts adverbs with every other speaker attribution and several other “mistakes.” But she wrote rip-roaring stories that pulled me into her fictive world.

    All this to say, I’ve put away my red pen except when I’m hired to edit. I do try to analyze things when I realize I’m having a strong reaction to a book:
    Why am I putting this book down when I only have 50 pages left? This should be the most exciting part of the story.

    Or, Why am I crying at this plot point but didn’t cry when something more tragic happened?

    That sort of thing. Asking those questions helps me to understand what works or doesn’t, at least for me.

    Becky

    Like

  6. Oh, Sally, in all fairness, you should read some of the reviews from people who didn’t like it as much as I did. Crista’s is great. John Otte’s. And of course Steve Rice always does a post on the weaknesses of a book.

    I don’t want to be a cheerleader. I do think, because this is “my kind of fantasy” I may have liked it more than others.

    Phyllis, for instance, didn’t like Hunter at first because he was … a sinful boy. I called him “rambunctious,” but sinful is accurate. The things he did weren’t malicious but some were vengeful, some disobedient, some prideful. He was a pretty average kind of guy, but he was definitely sinful. He just didn’t know it. This story was mostly his discovery of his sinful self.

    Anyway, read the other reviews, then you’ll have a balanced view of the book.

    Oh, and one blogger—I forget who—commented on the theology, saying it leaned strongly toward Calvinism, but I kept thinking as I read, Good thing Sally’s not reading this—she’d hate the theology.

    Not all of it. I think the Miller Brothers’ theology must be pretty similar to mine. They made some great statements about God’s sovereignty, but in dealing with suffering and free will, well, our views fit like a glove.

    Becky

    Like

  7. […] and Allan Miller, authors of Hunter Brown and the Secret of the Shadow, first in the Codebearer Series – tweener fantasy Hunter Brown and the Consuming Fire, Warner […]

    Like

  8. I enjoyed this book a lot

    Like


Comments are closed.